The Challenge
Non-governmental organizations operate under intense pressure to maximize social impact while facing severe budget constraints, limited technical capacity, and mission-centric cultures. Although artificial intelligence offers transformative capabilities to streamline operations and enhance advocacy, current research on AI adoption within the non-profit sector remains highly fragmented, localized, or focused exclusively on commercial paradigms. This creates a critical knowledge gap regarding how organizational size, resource distribution, and geographical contexts systematically influence the practical adoption, contextual challenges, and strategic implementation pathways for AI technologies across civil society.
Core Findings
Applying the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and SPIDER framework, the authors systematically synthesized 65 studies published between 2020 and 2025. Grounded in the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) theory, the study establishes six primary functional AI use case categories in NGOs: Engagement, Creativity, Decision-Making, Prediction, Management, and Optimization. The synthesis reveals that AI adoption across non-profits is structurally uneven and heavily skewed toward larger international entities with substantial technical infrastructure. Technology barriers center on system complexity and data governance; organizational hurdles involve skill deficits and risk-averse cultures; and environmental constraints stem from donor dynamics and regulatory volatility.
Strategic Takeaway
For scholars and digital leaders in organizational studies, this review bridges socio-technical theory and non-profit management by demonstrating how structural constraints reshape classic technology adoption paradigms. By adapting the TOE framework to mission-driven, non-commercial contexts, the research proves that non-profit digital transformation cannot simply replicate private-sector approaches. Strategic leaders can utilize these findings to construct contextual governance frameworks, align AI capabilities with organizational mission, and prioritize scalable, low-complexity applications—such as predictive fundraising and stakeholder engagement—to mitigate risk while driving social impact.